GrammarNavigator

Topics

Advanced

Emphasis & Cleft Sentences

How to emphasize specific parts of a sentence in Spanish, English and Chinese.

Compare languages

English uses 'it is...that' and stress. Spanish uses 'es...que/quien' and word order shifts. Chinese uses shì...de and topicalization with no verb change.

Examples

It was John who left

Fue Juan quien se fue

It was yesterday that he left

Fue ayer cuando se fue

What I want is peace

Lo que quiero es paz

I DID eat it (contrastive)

SÍ que lo comí / Lo comí, sí

Not until...

No fue hasta... que...

Only then...

Solo entonces...

Fronting (objects first)

Eso no lo sé

Examples

It was John who left

It was John who left

It was yesterday that he left

It was yesterday that he left

What I want is peace

What I want is peace

I DID eat it (contrastive)

I DID eat it / I did eat it

Not until...

Not until... did...

Only then...

Only then...

Fronting (objects first)

That I don't know

Examples

It was John who left

shìyuēhànzǒude

It was yesterday that he left

shìzuótiānzǒude

What I want is peace

yàodeshìpíng

I DID eat it (contrastive)

quèshíchīle / shìchīlede

Not until...

zhídào...cái...

Only then...

zhīyǒu...cái...

Fronting (objects first)

zhèzhīdào

Comparison at a glance

Grammar concepts Spanish English Chinese
It was John who left Fue Juan quien se fueIt was John who leftshìyuēhànzǒude
It was yesterday that he left Fue ayer cuando se fueIt was yesterday that he leftshìzuótiānzǒude
What I want is peace Lo que quiero es pazWhat I want is peaceyàodeshìpíng
I DID eat it (contrastive) SÍ que lo comí / Lo comí, síI DID eat it / I did eat itquèshíchīle / shìchīlede
Not until... No fue hasta... que...Not until... did...zhídào...cái...
Only then... Solo entonces...Only then...zhīyǒu...cái...
Fronting (objects first) Eso no lo séThat I don't knowzhèzhīdào

Side-by-side comparison

Grammar concepts Spanish English Chinese
It was John who left Fue Juan quien se fueIt was John who leftshìyuēhànzǒude
It was yesterday that he left Fue ayer cuando se fueIt was yesterday that he leftshìzuótiānzǒude
What I want is peace Lo que quiero es pazWhat I want is peaceyàodeshìpíng
I DID eat it (contrastive) SÍ que lo comí / Lo comí, síI DID eat it / I did eat itquèshíchīle / shìchīlede
Not until... No fue hasta... que...Not until... did...zhídào...cái...
Only then... Solo entonces...Only then...zhīyǒu...cái...
Fronting (objects first) Eso no lo séThat I don't knowzhèzhīdào

Examples in context

It was John who left

Spanish

Fue Juan quien se fue

English

It was John who left

Chinese

shìyuēhànzǒude

It was yesterday that he left

Spanish

Fue ayer cuando se fue

English

It was yesterday that he left

Chinese

shìzuótiānzǒude

What I want is peace

Spanish

Lo que quiero es paz

English

What I want is peace

Chinese

yàodeshìpíng

I DID eat it (contrastive)

Spanish

SÍ que lo comí / Lo comí, sí

English

I DID eat it / I did eat it

Chinese

quèshíchīle / shìchīlede

Not until...

Spanish

No fue hasta... que...

English

Not until... did...

Chinese

zhídào...cái...

Only then...

Spanish

Solo entonces...

English

Only then...

Chinese

zhīyǒu...cái...

Fronting (objects first)

Spanish

Eso no lo sé

English

That I don't know

Chinese

zhèzhīdào

Key Takeaways

Spanish: Uses es... que/quien clefts. Word order is flexible, so fronting is common. Stress and particles (sí, sólo) add emphasis.

English: Uses it is... that/who clefts and what pseudo-clefts. Stress (intonation) is crucial in spoken English. Negative fronting triggers inversion.

Chinese: Uses shì... de for emphasis on time, manner, or agent. Topic-comment structure naturally front-shifts information. No verb change or invers.

Key concepts compared: It was John who left, It was yesterday that he left, What I want is peace.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does English require inversion after negative fronting while Spanish and Chinese do not?
English negative fronting triggers auxiliary inversion: 'Not until he left did I cry.' Spanish keeps normal order: *No fue hasta que se fue que lloré.* Chinese uses the <ruby>直<rt>zhí</rt></ruby><ruby>到<rt>dào</rt></ruby>...<ruby>才<rt>cái</rt></ruby> structure without inversion: <ruby>直<rt>zhí</rt></ruby><ruby>到<rt>dào</rt></ruby><ruby>他<rt>tā</rt></ruby><ruby>走<rt>zǒu</rt></ruby><ruby>了<rt>le</rt></ruby><ruby>我<rt>wǒ</rt></ruby><ruby>才<rt>cái</rt></ruby><ruby>哭<rt>kū</rt></ruby>. The English inversion is a fossilized syntactic rule with no counterpart in Spanish or Chinese. Spanish speakers learning English will produce 'Not until he left I cried,' and Chinese speakers will use the <ruby>才<rt>cái</rt></ruby> construction by analogy.
How does the Chinese 是...的 (shì...de) cleft differ from English it-clefts in focus flexibility?
Chinese <ruby>是<rt>shì</rt></ruby>...<ruby>的<rt>de</rt></ruby> can focus on time, place, manner, instrument, or agent: <ruby>我<rt>wǒ</rt></ruby><ruby>是<rt>shì</rt></ruby><ruby>昨<rt>zuó</rt></ruby><ruby>天<rt>tiān</rt></ruby><ruby>买<rt>mǎi</rt></ruby><ruby>的<rt>de</rt></ruby><ruby>书<rt>shū</rt></ruby> (It was yesterday that I bought the book). English it-clefts typically focus on noun phrases: 'It was John who bought the book.' While English can cleft time ('It was yesterday that...'), it is stylistically marked. Spanish clefts are similarly restricted to noun phrases. Chinese learners of English will overuse time-clefts in English, and English learners of Chinese will underuse <ruby>是<rt>shì</rt></ruby>...<ruby>的<rt>de</rt></ruby> for non-agent focus.
What is pseudo-clefting, and why is it more productive in English than in Spanish or Chinese?
A pseudo-cleft highlights new information by nominalizing the predicate: 'What I want is peace.' English uses this structure frequently. Spanish prefers *Lo que quiero es paz.* Chinese does not have true pseudo-clefts; it uses topic-comment: <ruby>我<rt>wǒ</rt></ruby><ruby>要<rt>yào</rt></ruby><ruby>的<rt>de</rt></ruby><ruby>是<rt>shì</rt></ruby><ruby>和<rt>hé</rt></ruby><ruby>平<rt>píng</rt></ruby> (What I want is peace). English pseudo-clefts serve a specific rhetorical function — correcting a misconception — that Spanish and Chinese achieve through other means. An English speaker will overuse pseudo-clefts in Spanish, producing awkward calques.

References

  • Nueva gramática de la lengua española — Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española, 2010
  • The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language — Huddleston & Pullum, Cambridge University Press, 2002
  • A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Chinese Language — Li & Thompson, 1981

Last updated: June 4, 2026