GrammarNavigator

Topics

Intermediate

Valency & Argument Structure

How Spanish, English and Chinese distinguish transitive, intransitive, and ditransitive verbs.

Compare languages

Valency is the number of arguments a verb requires. Spanish and English have similar valency patterns. Chinese uses serial verb constructions and coverbs for complex argument structures.

Examples

Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument)

Juan duerme (subject only)

Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments)

Juan lee un libro (subject + direct object)

Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments)

Juan da un libro a María (S + DO + IO with a)

The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient)

La puerta se abrió (patient subject + se)

John opened the door (causative: agent + patient)

Juan abrió la puerta (agent + patient)

Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments)

Juan puso el libro en la mesa (S + DO + PP)

John broke the vase (causative transitive)

Juan rompió el jarrón (agent + patient)

The vase broke (intransitive alternation)

El jarrón se rompió (se = detransitivizer)

Examples

Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument)

John sleeps (subject only)

Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments)

John reads a book (subject + direct object)

Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments)

John gives Mary a book (S + IO + DO) / John gives a book to Mary

The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient)

The door opened (patient subject, no marking)

John opened the door (causative: agent + patient)

John opened the door (agent + patient)

Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments)

John put the book on the table (S + DO + PP)

John broke the vase (causative transitive)

John broke the vase (agent + patient)

The vase broke (intransitive alternation)

The vase broke (labile verb, no marking)

Examples

Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument)

yuēhànshuìjué (subject only)

Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments)

yuēhànshū (subject + object)

Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments)

yuēhàngěiběnshū (subject + gěi + recipient + object)

The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient)

ménkāile (patient subject, no marking)

John opened the door (causative: agent + patient)

yuēhànkāilemén (agent + patient + le)

Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments)

yuēhànshūfàngzàizhuōshàng ( + object + verb + location)

John broke the vase (causative transitive)

yuēhànlehuāpíng (agent + resultative verb + patient)

The vase broke (intransitive alternation)

huāpíngle (labile verb, no marking)

Comparison at a glance

Grammar concepts Spanish English Chinese
Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument) Juan duerme (subject only)John sleeps (subject only)yuēhànshuìjué (subject only)
Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments) Juan lee un libro (subject + direct object)John reads a book (subject + direct object)yuēhànshū (subject + object)
Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments) Juan da un libro a María (S + DO + IO with a)John gives Mary a book (S + IO + DO) / John gives a book to Maryyuēhàngěiběnshū (subject + gěi + recipient + object)
The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient) La puerta se abrió (patient subject + se)The door opened (patient subject, no marking)ménkāile (patient subject, no marking)
John opened the door (causative: agent + patient) Juan abrió la puerta (agent + patient)John opened the door (agent + patient)yuēhànkāilemén (agent + patient + le)
Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments) Juan puso el libro en la mesa (S + DO + PP)John put the book on the table (S + DO + PP)yuēhànshūfàngzàizhuōshàng ( + object + verb + location)
John broke the vase (causative transitive) Juan rompió el jarrón (agent + patient)John broke the vase (agent + patient)yuēhànlehuāpíng (agent + resultative verb + patient)
The vase broke (intransitive alternation) El jarrón se rompió (se = detransitivizer)The vase broke (labile verb, no marking)huāpíngle (labile verb, no marking)

Side-by-side comparison

Grammar concepts Spanish English Chinese
Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument) Juan duerme (subject only)John sleeps (subject only)yuēhànshuìjué (subject only)
Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments) Juan lee un libro (subject + direct object)John reads a book (subject + direct object)yuēhànshū (subject + object)
Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments) Juan da un libro a María (S + DO + IO with a)John gives Mary a book (S + IO + DO) / John gives a book to Maryyuēhàngěiběnshū (subject + gěi + recipient + object)
The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient) La puerta se abrió (patient subject + se)The door opened (patient subject, no marking)ménkāile (patient subject, no marking)
John opened the door (causative: agent + patient) Juan abrió la puerta (agent + patient)John opened the door (agent + patient)yuēhànkāilemén (agent + patient + le)
Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments) Juan puso el libro en la mesa (S + DO + PP)John put the book on the table (S + DO + PP)yuēhànshūfàngzàizhuōshàng ( + object + verb + location)
John broke the vase (causative transitive) Juan rompió el jarrón (agent + patient)John broke the vase (agent + patient)yuēhànlehuāpíng (agent + resultative verb + patient)
The vase broke (intransitive alternation) El jarrón se rompió (se = detransitivizer)The vase broke (labile verb, no marking)huāpíngle (labile verb, no marking)

Examples in context

Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument)

Spanish

Juan duerme (subject only)

English

John sleeps (subject only)

Chinese

yuēhànshuìjué (subject only)

Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments)

Spanish

Juan lee un libro (subject + direct object)

English

John reads a book (subject + direct object)

Chinese

yuēhànshū (subject + object)

Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments)

Spanish

Juan da un libro a María (S + DO + IO with a)

English

John gives Mary a book (S + IO + DO) / John gives a book to Mary

Chinese

yuēhàngěiběnshū (subject + gěi + recipient + object)

The door opened (unaccusative: 1 argument, patient)

Spanish

La puerta se abrió (patient subject + se)

English

The door opened (patient subject, no marking)

Chinese

ménkāile (patient subject, no marking)

John opened the door (causative: agent + patient)

Spanish

Juan abrió la puerta (agent + patient)

English

John opened the door (agent + patient)

Chinese

yuēhànkāilemén (agent + patient + le)

Put the book on the table (locative: 3 arguments)

Spanish

Juan puso el libro en la mesa (S + DO + PP)

English

John put the book on the table (S + DO + PP)

Chinese

yuēhànshūfàngzàizhuōshàng ( + object + verb + location)

John broke the vase (causative transitive)

Spanish

Juan rompió el jarrón (agent + patient)

English

John broke the vase (agent + patient)

Chinese

yuēhànlehuāpíng (agent + resultative verb + patient)

The vase broke (intransitive alternation)

Spanish

El jarrón se rompió (se = detransitivizer)

English

The vase broke (labile verb, no marking)

Chinese

huāpíngle (labile verb, no marking)

Key Takeaways

Key concepts compared: Sleep (intransitive: 1 argument), Read a book (transitive: 2 arguments), Give Mary a book (ditransitive: 3 arguments).

Understanding valency & argument structure across languages prevents common transfer errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Spanish require a prepositional indirect object ('a María') while English allows double-object ditransitives ('gave Mary a book') and Chinese uses serial verb constructions?
Spanish ditransitive verbs require the recipient to be marked with the preposition *a*: *Juan dio un libro A María* (John gave a book to María). English allows two patterns: 'John gave a book TO María' (prepositional) or 'John gave María a book' (double object). Chinese uses a serial construction: <ruby>约<rt>yuē</rt></ruby><ruby>翰<rt>hàn</rt></ruby><ruby>给<rt>gěi</rt></ruby><ruby>玛<rt>mǎ</rt></ruby><ruby>丽<rt>lì</rt></ruby><ruby>一<rt>yī</rt></ruby><ruby>本<rt>běn</rt></ruby><ruby>书<rt>shū</rt></ruby> (John give María one book) with no preposition and a different word order. An English speaker learning Spanish will produce *Juan dio María un libro* (omitting *a*), which is ungrammatical. A Chinese speaker learning Spanish will also omit *a*. An English speaker learning Chinese will insert prepositions where none are needed.
How does Chinese use coverbs to manage argument structures that English and Spanish handle with prepositions or case marking?
Chinese coverbs function like prepositions but retain verbal properties: <ruby>在<rt>zài</rt></ruby> (be at) in <ruby>在<rt>zài</rt></ruby><ruby>北<rt>běi</rt></ruby><ruby>京<rt>jīng</rt></ruby><ruby>工<rt>gōng</rt></ruby><ruby>作<rt>zuò</rt></ruby> (at Beijing work = work in Beijing). English uses a pure preposition: 'work IN Beijing.' Spanish uses a preposition: *trabajar EN Beijing.* The Chinese coververb can be negated and modified like a verb, while English and Spanish prepositions cannot. An English speaker learning Chinese will treat <ruby>在<rt>zài</rt></ruby> as a preposition and will be confused by its verbal behavior. A Chinese speaker learning English will omit prepositions: 'I work Beijing' (ungrammatical) because Chinese coververbs do not require a separate preposition.
Why do English and Spanish speakers learning Chinese struggle with the verb-noun compounding that expresses what their languages handle with simple intransitive verbs?
Chinese expresses many basic intransitive actions with verb-noun compounds: <ruby>睡<rt>shuì</rt></ruby><ruby>觉<rt>jué</rt></ruby> (sleep-sleep = sleep), <ruby>吃<rt>chī</rt></ruby><ruby>饭<rt>fàn</rt></ruby> (eat-rice = eat a meal), <ruby>洗<rt>xǐ</rt></ruby><ruby>澡<rt>zǎo</rt></ruby> (wash-bath = bathe). English and Spanish use simple intransitive verbs: 'sleep,' *dormir*; 'eat,' *comer.* The Chinese compound is not optional: <ruby>睡<rt>shuì</rt></ruby> alone means 'to sleep' in a general sense, but <ruby>睡<rt>shuì</rt></ruby><ruby>觉<rt>jué</rt></ruby> is the natural collocation for 'go to sleep.' An English speaker learning Chinese will use bare verbs and sound telegraphic: <ruby>我<rt>wǒ</rt></ruby><ruby>睡<rt>shuì</rt></ruby> (I sleep) is possible but <ruby>我<rt>wǒ</rt></ruby><ruby>睡<rt>shuì</rt></ruby><ruby>觉<rt>jué</rt></ruby> (I sleep-sleep) is more natural. A Spanish speaker will make the same error. Both must learn that Chinese valency is partly lexicalized in compounds.

References

  • Nueva gramática de la lengua española — Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española, 2010
  • The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language — Huddleston & Pullum, Cambridge University Press, 2002
  • A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Chinese Language — Li & Thompson, 1981

Last updated: June 4, 2026